Ah, I do love this visionary answer, dressed in the clothes of a question. Thanks!

Yes, and Yes.

The internet is a means, not an end in itself, leaving it usable for many ends.

Why not?

It is not, in fact: perpetual energy is a law-of-nature. I suspect that your question is realy about the possibility to cheat the balanced natural law in our quest to consume specific energy without bothering with balance. That, indeed, is a delusional notion.

If you let me, why not? Let me elaborate by asking the following question: “Is it ever acceptable to allow people to make me feel small, miserable and frightened sothat I do what they want me to do for the sake of expediency?”

Karma! Of what little we know (science) the prevailing principle in the universe is balance. And yes, I agree with Jordan, it is foremost a produce of my personal mind. Give me a hammer and I will show you nails everywhere.

While we debate the debatable premise that ‘overpopulation is a problem’ I am quite confident that by the time nature agrees, it will be solved ‘naturaly’. For now the moral high ground would be to better distribute Mother Earth’s resources.

There is a genuine philosophical paradox in your compound question! Say, for the arguement, that the answers to the first two questions would be #1 man, #2 nothing. Would you rephrase the third question? If we understand nature well, species came and went. In that context the third question is redundant. So I ask thee: [...]

The very word ‘ethical’ implies judgement, indeed. Without judgement, no ethics. In the greater scheme of things judgement, and by it: ethics, do(es) not exist. Remember: paradise was before we ate from the fruit of the tree of right and wrong, and ethics were born

A paradoxical question: is judgement ethical?

Knowing what art is (may I suggest: expressing oneself) would rather lead to accepting every human action as art rather then asking for its purpose. Anything not limited by purpose is… art.

Answering to you (the sentient creator) my aswers are #1 dont know, pray tell, and #2 are you?

You can not. And you, we, I do it all the time. In fact, were we to decide only upon having ‘all the information’ it would be the very end of deciding. This process (how) is called human behavior.

Both.

A smile is in the eye of the beholder. Not joking!

As with the (sound of the) falling tree in the forest, the practical answer lies within the one who asks the question. Life is just another word for me being aware (of me). It only gets complicated when ‘me’ starts projecting aspects of ‘me’ on that of which ‘me’ feels disconnected (dead). So, there is [...]

Little else ever did!

I already chose. No regrets!

You just haven’t found the best things in life yet. Keep looking…

Absolute power implies the absolute powerless, and corruption implies second thoughts by those who gave away their power.

It would be the materialization of self-love, the prerequisite of all other expressions of love.

Just used major force extracting a rusted nail from a beam: it felt right. In a court of law this question would be deemed ‘leading the witness’.